 | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.castle, Craig Hamilton writes:
> well, my castle scenarios have lots of women & babes (about four guys to every
> girl) but about half of these chicks are lesbians, so the men are still pretty
> restless at night.(could be fun <snicker>)
You know...this is somehow becoming even more bizarre than discussing the sex
lives of cartoon characters. And that takes doing... I'm sorry, I just can't
picture those lil' yellow guys doing the nasty. It's just plain wrong.
> and i don't know about the rest of the castle crowd, but that dark forest boy
> with the pageboy hair... definitely gay.
Craig, you silly goose...the dark forest 'boy' is really a maiden in disguise.
Her father, a minor Baron, died and upon taking up his father's titles, her
ambitious and greedy brother arranged for her to marry a wealthy and lecherous
Marquis. But the strong-willed girl wasn't going to stand for such a thing, so
on the eve of her wedding day, she disguised herself as a page and escaped into
the forest where she joined the Dark Forest bandits. It's taken a lot of
cunning to preserve her disguise, but so far, the bandits haven't found out.
(Their leader harbors some suspicions - he was a good friend of the girls'
father before he was exiled, and he feels strongly paternal to the girl now and
tries to keep her out of trouble.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
>
> You know...this is somehow becoming even more bizarre than discussing the sex
> lives of cartoon characters. And that takes doing... I'm sorry, I just can't
> picture those lil' yellow guys doing the nasty. It's just plain wrong.
Not to mention the fact that none of the minifigs have any equipment anyway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.castle, Ed Jones writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
> >
> > You know...this is somehow becoming even more bizarre than discussing the sex
> > lives of cartoon characters. And that takes doing... I'm sorry, I just can't
> > picture those lil' yellow guys doing the nasty. It's just plain wrong.
>
> Not to mention the fact that none of the minifigs have any equipment anyway.
what do you mean no equipment? there's swords, and lances, and sheilds, and--
oh. OHHH! THAT kind of equipment!
~ silly goose craig
| | | | | | |
