| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > I nominate:
> >
> > - Wayne Gramlich
>
> Whoops - brain fart - I am not sure Wayne meets the requirements. I'll ask him.
>
> -Tim
Tim:
I was wondering what was happening to LSC effort, and here I discover there was
yet
another newsgroup that I should have been subscribed to. I'll spend later
tonight
catching up on what I've missed.
With regards to the LSC nomination, as much as I would like to accept the
nomination, at this time I do not meet LSC requirements. I might add that I
think the LSC membership requirements
are exteremely reasonable. Thus, I request that you withdraw the nomination.
If the LSC that forms wishes to ask my opinions on procedures and processes
based on my previous W3C work, I will be delighted to chime in.
One of these days I will get around to adding an LDraw format reader to my 3D
software. When that happens, I will finally meet the LSC requirements.
If folks are interested, my current 3D work is going on at this URL:
<http://gramlich.net/projects/cnc/chips/index.html>
I have been spending a great deal of time writing a 3D solids library
that support the union, intersection and difference of solid surfaces.
An example of that work can be found at the following URL:
<http://gramlich.net/projects/cnc/chips/AttachPlate.html>
Cheers,
-Wayne
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> I was wondering what was happening to LSC effort, and here I discover there was
> yet
> another newsgroup that I should have been subscribed to. I'll spend later
> tonight
> catching up on what I've missed.
Yeah, the compartmentalized among us were asking I post LSC stuff in
cad.dev.org.ldraw :-)
> With regards to the LSC nomination, as much as I would like to accept the
> nomination, at this time I do not meet LSC requirements. I might add that I
> think the LSC membership requirements
> are exteremely reasonable. Thus, I request that you withdraw the nomination.
Consider it withdrawn. My mistake for not thinking ahead :-)
I'd like to add a nomination for Larry Pieniazek - he was also involved in sorta
the preliminary discussion that lead to the LSC Proposal drafts, and has some
good ideas.
> If the LSC that forms wishes to ask my opinions on procedures and processes
> based on my previous W3C work, I will be delighted to chime in.
I hope they are interested in what you have to say - your advice and insight has
been invaluable to me.
-Tim
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> I'd like to add a nomination for Larry Pieniazek - he was also involved in sorta
> the preliminary discussion that lead to the LSC Proposal drafts, and has some
> good ideas.
I've given this some considerable thought and while I think it's important to
have a community focused voice on the committee, I have decided to decline this
nomination. There are a number of other very well qualified nominees and I'm
concerned about getting spread too thin. I want to thank Tim and others for
their expressions of support, though.
I do plan to stand for the overall Ldraw.org executive committee once those
elections are launched, though. (and it is my expectation that will be happening
fairly soon, the LSC election should validate a lot of the technical work that
will make elections happen).
|
|
|
