 | | | | | |
Hi all,
The following parts:
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6644.dat
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6644a.dat
Have been marked with a "hold" by above user with comment:
"I have taken another more thorough look at this part and found numerous
errors - to many to list here.
I'll forward an email to the author with my suggestions."
I have received no email concerning these, even after emailing the above
address querying the problems, and can't find any such errors myself, does
anyone else know what may be wrong with them?
Thanks
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford writes:
> Hi all,
>
> The following parts:
>
> http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6644.dat
> http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/6644a.dat
>
> Have been marked with a "hold" by above user with comment:
>
> "I have taken another more thorough look at this part and found numerous
> errors - to many to list here.
> I'll forward an email to the author with my suggestions."
>
> I have received no email concerning these, even after emailing the above
> address querying the problems, and can't find any such errors myself, does
> anyone else know what may be wrong with them?
Assuming you don't hear something back soon, or hear something from SteveB,
you can always clear the hold yourself by reuploading the parts...
you could even put in a remark that if someone puts a hold they should be
able to say why or answer their emails...
BTW did you agree with this comment? "The size of this part should be
slightly less than a 1 x 2 plate, but this size discrepancy can be
overlooked with this part. " IMHO that's a reason for a hold even if that
reviewer didn't do that.
Is there any chance the last two posts are from the same person?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hi ROSCO,
I had seen that note a while back and intended to email the reviewer as soon
as I was free of a certain project I am about to complete ...
I can give you one answer: this is one of the few parts I have ever done and
I am certain it has multiple errors - there was stuff going on with it that
I could not figure out. Then you came along and offered to pick it up abnd
complete it. I'm not sure if you actually fixed some of the stuff or not.
But a comment saying that the part is fundamentally wrong does not strike me
as odd, unless you have done considerable work on it.
So, the question is, who picks it up from here? I am glad to go at it again,
low key. If you are energized and ready to jump on it, that is also fine.
BTW, the part was created unsing notepad and Mlcad only - no measurement
instruments were used. I would probably have a second go at it equipped with
better tools.
Anyway, my two cents.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.cad, Miguel Agullo writes:
> Hi ROSCO,
>
> I had seen that note a while back and intended to email the reviewer as soon
> as I was free of a certain project I am about to complete ...
>
> I can give you one answer: this is one of the few parts I have ever done and
> I am certain it has multiple errors - there was stuff going on with it that
> I could not figure out. Then you came along and offered to pick it up abnd
> complete it. I'm not sure if you actually fixed some of the stuff or not.
> But a comment saying that the part is fundamentally wrong does not strike me
> as odd, unless you have done considerable work on it.
Yep, I did considerable work on it 8?)
> So, the question is, who picks it up from here? I am glad to go at it again,
> low key. If you are energized and ready to jump on it, that is also fine.
I'm happy to continue it's development, and lar points out there's one
comment about it being slightly too big, which I'll look into, but I just
can't see the multiple problems mentioned in the comment - I'd be happy to
look at them too but I have no idea what they are!
ROSCO
| | | | | | |
