To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 17076
17075  |  17077
Subject: 
Re: The future of LDraw?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:18:13 GMT
Viewed: 
20224 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
I agree here partially. I too think that some bits here are bit too formal...
but I tend to think that !HISTORY lines are pretty much useful to keep track on
what's happened and when.. but something that I can't possibly understand is
that if a part author completely remakes a part and gets it to the tracker, the
rewrite must be a !HISTORY line and the author cannot get the Author line!
Really de-motivating...

Is it really...???
I more meant that it de-motivates me from remaking parts if I don't get the
proper credit for them! I'm a human being - I want credit for what I do. But
maybe "de-motivating" is the bad word for it. Maybe "annoying" is better there.

But I just can't see the point in it. If you make a part from scratch - be that
a new one or something that has been on the parts tracker before - it hasn't had
former history. So why can't the history then be wiped out? Even more, we
already wipe the history when remaking Non-CA parts.

Anyway, the average LDraw user will never see the Author line or the History ones!

I definitely don't subscribe to the all legalese line we see today (in LDraw or
in real life!).
Ditto. I hate legal stuff. The world would be a better place without it.

To me, it's just something that must be done. Fortunately there
are tools to manage this (Datheader). So it is and remains a hobby (and an
addictive one!)
Indeed. But the problem for me is that most parts I have around are either
Bionicle parts which are difficult to author or generic Technic parts that have
already been modeled. So the hobby is challenging for me.

Philo

-Santeri



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The future of LDraw?
 
(...) For the Non-CA parts it should be clear that for legal reasons there has to be another author mentioned. That's why it is handled there in this way. For normal parts it is much more difficult. From what point on it is made from the scratch? - (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The future of LDraw?
 
(...) Is it really...??? Anyway, the average LDraw user will never see the Author line or the History ones! I definitely don't subscribe to the all legalese line we see today (in LDraw or in real life!). To me, it's just something that must be done. (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)

105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR