Subject:
|
Re: The future of LDraw?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:08:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
20074 times
|
| |
|
|
> I agree here partially. I too think that some bits here are bit too formal...
> but I tend to think that !HISTORY lines are pretty much useful to keep track on
> what's happened and when.. but something that I can't possibly understand is
> that if a part author completely remakes a part and gets it to the tracker, the
> rewrite must be a !HISTORY line and the author cannot get the Author line!
> Really de-motivating...
Is it really...??? Anyway, the average LDraw user will never see the Author line
or the History ones!
I definitely don't subscribe to the all legalese line we see today (in LDraw or
in real life!). To me, it's just something that must be done. Fortunately there
are tools to manage this (Datheader). So it is and remains a hobby (and an
addictive one!)
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) I more meant that it de-motivates me from remaking parts if I don't get the proper credit for them! I'm a human being - I want credit for what I do. But maybe "de-motivating" is the bad word for it. Maybe "annoying" is better there. But I just (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) LEdit's pretty much outdated these days. It doesn't support the LDConfig colours, nor can it edit MPD:s and the LSC is not taking it too seriously when making choices. (at least I'm not..) (...) I agree here partially. I too think that some (...) (14 years ago, 20-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
