Subject:
|
Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:57:00 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2335 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> If we standardise the dimensions to be different to what is moulded on the part,
> that text should go into the "0 KEYWORDS" line.
>
> Under this proposal, 3641 which started this discussion would become
>
> Tyre 6 x 7.5 Offset Tread (rim diameter im mm)
> or
> Tyre 6 x 20 Offset Tread (rim diameter in LDu)
>
> Comments, please.
I support this general notion, would like to see everything in LDU and think the
original molded description should go in KEYWORDS (perhaps with a qualifyer
"molded" or something?)
~~~~
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
| Mike Heidemann and others make a good point here (URL) about qualifying the LDraw descriptions for tyres. Current commercial nomenclature follows an ISO standard (see for example (URL)) typically using Width"/"AspectRatio"...mDiameter, where (...) (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
