To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.microscaleOpen lugnet.build.microscale in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Micro-scale / 664
663  |  665
Subject: 
Re: Why not smaller & more affordable for all? was Re: LEGO Factory sets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:34:27 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
6930 times
  
In lugnet.build.microscale, Jeff Szklennik wrote:
   In lugnet.build.microscale, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
   In lugnet.build.microscale, Bruce Hietbrink wrote:
   Hey all,

SNIP
  
The Airport set, with 607 pieces, is USD$39.99.

The Amusement Park set is USD$69.99 and is 1,344 pieces.

Finally, the big set, Skyline, is USD$129.99 for 2,747 pieces.

SNIP

This is an example of unwise marketing/pricing on the Lego Co.‘s part (IMHO). To make these more widely accessible, the sets should have been sold per individual winner (just the pirate ship, just the Statue of Liberty, etc.) ...

SNIP
  
Jeff

I think the grouping together of designs reduced the company’s risk of getting left with shelves full of the least popular one. I’m not sure how many of you buy for parts like I do, but if I were just out for sand green bricks and I could buy just the statue of liberty set, I probably would. In fact if that were tru I’d buy at least 10 statues and forget the rest. If lots of people did that, each with their preference, there could be one or two types that didn’t sell very well and others that ran out quickly.

I think the company knows that the AFOL community is sufficiently strong for some people to buy the sets even if there are parts they don’t want, and sell the unwanted parts on Bricklink.

There’s also the question of the different sizes of sets, since there is a wide range of amounts of parts even between the ten winning designs.

The scaling of price per piece over the three sets shows what I believed already, that it’s cheaper in bigger sets, given similar types of pieces. This agrees with common sense, since the overheads per set are similar, reducing the company’s costs. $5 in $130 is a lot more economical than $5 in $15!

Lower proportional overheads for bigger sets is also a reason why I want to be able to buy parts by the 10000 of each type. I’m fed up with paying too much for small sets when I know it would save both us and the company money for them to sell parts in much larger quantities to AFOLs. Get rid of the overheads of fancy boxes with pictures, expensive instructions and advertising literature and just let me buy plain boxes of parts.

I want to see a list of what parts I could buy by the K8 (~15kg), and the prices of them. Then I’ll go on a serious shopping spree. Let’s start with bricks and plates of all sizes in all colours, with a price half that of the current PaB shop prices. A few of those and we can start building our own Legoland gardens. Resource the community!

Mark



Message is in Reply To:
  Why not smaller & more affordable for all? was Re: LEGO Factory sets
 
(...) SNIP (...) SNIP This is an example of unwise marketing/pricing on the Lego Co.'s part (IMHO). To make these more widely accessible, the sets should have been sold per individual winner (just the pirate ship, just the Statue of Liberty, etc.) (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)  

47 Messages in This Thread:





















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR