To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.announceOpen lugnet.announce in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Announcements / 2847
2846  |  2848
Subject: 
murfl
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.org.it.itlug, lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Original-Followup-To: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:31:26 GMT
Highlighted: 
!! (details)
Viewed: 
6521 times
  
This message has been flagged — it contains content which may not be
appropriate for all viewers. At your own discretion, you may view the
content by clicking the "View Raw Message" link above.

If you post a reply to this message, please remember to be courteous,
respectful, and mature, and remember that people of all ages and
cultures participate here.



Message has 10 Replies:
  (canceled)
 
  (canceled)
 
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) - snip - This discussion venue, despite what many obviously believe, does not have an agenda to tell you what you should think or what to believe. It's a simple request, really: please just keep the cussing down. Let me be clear on one thing. (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)  
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) I would like to point out: (...) Isn't that an editorial control??? This is a paradox! I agree with the fact that Lugnet should remain a pleasant place to talk but as far as today I don't agree with the way how this is done. It is the same as (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) I guess I'd probably change the phrasing Larry used here-- Posting profanity IS a violation of the TOU, no if's about it. This speaks it better: (...) No two ways about it, you're already in violation. Question is whether or not you want to (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) I wasn't the least offended. In fact, I thought it was a misspelling of something (which I didn't try to decode) when I read the post. (...) I agree with you. There's no difference between admins cancelling and admins threatening action if the (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET---WHY SWEAR?
 
(snip) two words: WHY SWEAR? My experience has been that people who swear continually aren't intelligent enough to come up with a better word to use in their vocabulary. (I figure I'm going to get some nasty comments from that statement..let's see (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
Just my two cents... But if your vocabulary is limited to the colorful metaphors maybe you should study a little... It's not that hard. And if "all hell breaking loose" is one e-mail from Larry then perhaps you should just relax. What could have (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
In lugnet.announce, Willy Tschager wrote: snipped (...) direct from the ToU: "Additionally, you specifically acknowledge and agree that LUGNET and its owners, operators and/or related entities are not liable for any defamatory, offensive, or illegal (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
WTF?!?! Are you gonna quit LUGNET Community?!? SOrry Willy but I don't agree with ya. I got the chance to meet and to know you in 2003 (remember my oddissey in Bozen and Milan?) and I think you're one of the smarter soul I've ever met. However this (...) (19 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)

29 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR