Subject:
|
Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 17:13:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
736 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, James Brown writes:
> OK. I was completely unaware that the term I habitually use was considered
> offensive. Now that I've been made aware, I'm voluntarily banning myself.
As it turns out, I've just received word that JAL *has* been banned.
You can consider me to be "voluntarily banning" myself as well until this is
changed, although I would consider it to be more of a "this is ridiculous and
I'll have no part of a community that is run like this" kind of a thing.
eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
| (...) Well, I was hoping someone wouldn't waste their time building just that list. Seriously, where does it get us? You missed my instances of a certain 3-letter word...are you sure you don't want to make a LUGNET page listing all of the violations (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
| (...) <snip list, including me> OK. (...) OK. I was completely unaware that the term I habitually use was considered offensive. Now that I've been made aware, I'm voluntarily banning myself. James (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
