Subject:
|
Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 03:07:25 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm&StopSpam&.org
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
701 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> I have a major problem with their concept of karma, which is why LUGNET's
> article ratings system doesn't give higher precedence to any particular
> posters.
Agreed; it's a bad idea -- ref. especially the "karma whore" phenomenon.
Instead of actually thinking about something, people are very quick to try
to post something that _looks_ insightful to the moderators, for the sole
purpose of inflating their score.
> This is why anyone (any member, that is) can rate anyone else's article at
> LUGNET. I hate the idea of moderation points -- it's supposed to make things
> more fair, but I think it makes things less fair.
Anyone at /. is eligible to become a moderator -- it's not an elite
hand-picked group. Basically, it just rotates, so not everyone is a
moderator all of the time. This is largely just to spread out the work load,
and I know that works for me -- if I always had moderation privs, I'd
probably never use them. Since I do get them every now and then, I feel like
I'm contributing to my civic duty and try to use the points I have
responsibly.
Analogy: I wouldn't be too annoyed to be called for jury duty every now and
then. But if I could just go serve on a jury whenever I wanted, I probably
would never do it. Actually, that's a good analogy, 'cause it leads into the
abuse thing. If the workload is shared, one single person can't do much
damage. Just think what a scary bunch of power-freak wackos those volunteer
jurors must be. *grin*
> Wow, I usually read Slashdot at a threshold of 3 or 4, so I haven't noticed
> that. Half, really? Yikes. (I pick 3 or 4 to limit the number of articles,
I'd say that was an exaggeration. Furthermore, such off-topic debates are
usually marked as such. (Ironically demonstrating that the moderation system
*does* work.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Just look what ratings did to Slashdot!
|
| (...) I have a major problem with their concept of karma, which is why LUGNET's article ratings system doesn't give higher precedence to any particular posters. (...) This is why anyone (any member, that is) can rate anyone else's article at LUGNET. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
