Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 02:47:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSAYNOTOSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
2067 times
|
| |
|
|
Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote:
> -this post is in the wrong NG (ie, off-topic)
> -this post is OK, but not very useful
> -this post is very informative
> -this post features great MOCs/web sites/[etc] • [snip]
> Right; but pure numbers aren't really helping. Categorizing posts
> by "usefulness" is downright inappropriate and unhelpful. Because what's
> useful and important to someone (e.g. info about a cool new mindstorms set
> that is sighted in stores), will be useless to me and vice versa.
> That's why I think that written-out statements are more useful than numbers.
Good point -- this is kind of what I was trying to say, although I'd taken
it to a further extreme. (Even less choices.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
