 | | Re: Znap popularity? —Wayne R. Hussey
|
| | | (...) Lego (...) The major problem with the "popularity" issue of Znap, is that it is limited to those who can see an immediate use for it. I put myself into that category and want more ;-). It is a specialized piece group. It is an extrapolation of (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Changing email address (was:Re: Znap popularity?) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | In lugnet.znap, Wayne R. Hussey writes: <snip> (...) Hi Wayne! I'm just wondering why you aren't fixing your address in the lugnet header, instead of putting it in your sig. In case it's because you don't know how-- simply point your browser here: (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.znap, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Znap popularity? —Philip Ogston
|
| | | | (...) Good idea, I'd be willing to buy up surplus Znap parts from motor collectors, I'd even be willing to pay a little for it (or maybe trade some new motors?). I'd hate to see it all go to waste. My theory is that just about any construction toy, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Znap popularity? —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) My deal isn't nearly as enticing as those who will buy Znap from you motor- lovers, but I will be willing to trade for specific items. I'll post the list late tomorrow with the first pics of my Znap creations. Keep in mind that I didn't spend (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | | |
