Subject:
|
Re: A Lego first?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.znap
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:28:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2458 times
|
| |
(canceled)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: A Lego first?
|
| (...) expected (...) they (...) contents. (...) factory sealed. I went back and purchased the rest of them (16, they're only $1.97), and compared the weight of them to the other small sets using a scale at work. All of the 3501 boxes weighed exactly (...) (24 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![A Lego first? -Joe Davenport (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: A Lego first? -Dean Husby (11-Apr-00 to lugnet.znap)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: A Lego first? -Joe Davenport (11-Apr-00 to lugnet.znap)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A Lego first? -Kevin Salm (17-Apr-00 to lugnet.znap, lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: A Lego first? -Joe Davenport (19-Apr-00 to lugnet.market.theory)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|