 | | ZNAP as framework (was ZNAP at GR TRU!) —Cary Clark
|
| | | I'm building ZNAP choo-choo bridges as well. One is 6 feet long and carries two levels of trains, so I have some feel for how ZNAP would extend to large-scale construction frames. ZNAP is softer than TECHNIC beams; it flexes a lot more, which has (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: ZNAP as framework (was ZNAP at GR TRU!) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | Thanks for the report! I hadn't thought of flexibility as an advantage. Now that you bring it up, it could be really cool, because it's another fact of life in a big city that will become exaggerated in the model. Except that instead of a 100-story (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: ZNAP as framework (was ZNAP at GR TRU!) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | After a few observation sessions at the 383 Madison Av building site (that's in New York where my company is building anew) I have decided to try just a cubic lattice. No triangular beam thingies, and I don't yet know what a Znap "panel" is that (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-00, to lugnet.znap)
|
| | | | |
