|
| | Re: rare colours in: Life on Mars
|
| (...) Looking at it in person I'd call the new 'red' Dusty Rose or some such. Mike (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | Re: New sets
|
| (...) 60xx is normally castle so I would be skeptical that these numbers are the correct numbers (...) ditto, 63xx is normally town (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | Re: LEGO.COM/mars now running!
|
| (...) Actually, until we send humans to mars we won't know what life is ther or was there in the past. It is entirely possible that humanoid life forms are living in small colonies on/under the suface of mars. After all, if we could do it, why (...) (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
| | | | Re: LEGO.COM/mars now running!
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) what (...) possible. True, but normally sci-fi (as opposed to fantasy) takes its different premises from things where we are not sure yet, not things we already know are untrue (e.g. blue aliens on Mars). (...) (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.space)
| | | | New sets
|
| I was in Shopko and they show several new Lego sets on their shelves (no sets, just names). I'm not positive about the set numbers , their numbers are always Lego numbers Throwabouts (5992?) Exploration station (6263?) Arctic? Snow Stormer (6297?) (...) (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.year.2001)
| |