 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) same (...) as (...) My impression was that they won't be releasing castle and Harry Potter at the same time was not a licensing issue, but an issue that they only want to support one theme in a general type, and since Harry Potter heavily (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: No speculations here...
|
|
(...) Perhaps Slave will take a differnt form in the next SW flick? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: No speculations here...
|
|
They're saying that Lego is going to come out with another Slave I. It might be an UCS, because what's the point in having two minifig Slave I (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
(...) Again, for those who have just joined us...: LoM is *not* considered Space any more than Aquazone (or Spaceport, which LoM replaces) was. If anything (shudder, shake, sputter) it's considered part of Town--phylogenically, but definitely NOT in (...) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
|
just as Space cannot be released as (...) So this is officially confirmed? How and why could LTG release LOM then? Is inn't that considered Space legally? Eric (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
