|
|
 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or Legends). (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| In lugnet.year.2002, John Rudy writes: <snip> (...) Roger that... They gave the info, they knew what would happen to it, no issue. Matthew, by being mysterious, is doing his source a disservice. (if it was OK for him to know and discuss, he ought to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) Geez, replying to my own post...this is bad, but I needed to revisit this with some thoughts. Yeah, I agree, Harry Potter is a poor substitute for a true castle theme. Also, Star Wars is a poor substitute for a true Space line (although I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) I wish I could tell you this isn't true, but I believe this to be the case. No true castle that I could ascertain. There were some new sets dealing with some type of monster theme (like vampires, werewolves, etc) They even had a werewolf head (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) I'll answer the rest of this too. Yes, I've seen the robots, being a big fan of battlebots I'm only 1/2 satisfied but I realize Lego has it's own mindset on the issue so I'm okay with it. I think there is a grabber, a pusher, a "puncher" and a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
