 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) OK, here's a question or two for you: Where did you get this information, why should we think it's authentic, and if you do assert it's authentic, is it information that TLC wants revealed at this time? Todd once said he didn't want to see (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —John Rudy
| | | | | (...) Larry et all, I'll poke my head in here and tell you all about some 2002 info I got, it's a long story, bear with me. As some of you know, I attended the National Scout Jamboree in VA for 12 days last and this week. (Returned Wed. Night) My (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Matthew Teets
| | | | | | (...) I'll answer the rest of this too. Yes, I've seen the robots, being a big fan of battlebots I'm only 1/2 satisfied but I realize Lego has it's own mindset on the issue so I'm okay with it. I think there is a grabber, a pusher, a "puncher" and a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | In lugnet.year.2002, John Rudy writes: <snip> (...) Roger that... They gave the info, they knew what would happen to it, no issue. Matthew, by being mysterious, is doing his source a disservice. (if it was OK for him to know and discuss, he ought to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | |
