 | | Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
Hi, everyone-- I haven't seen any notice about this, but Tim Saupé at FBTB (URL) has some *incredible* photos from the LEGO display at the 2002 Toy Fair. In particular are lots of pics of new HP and Star Wars items, but also *this* little Lego (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) Yup, he’s been alludin’ to this for quite some time now! ~Tim’s one part man, two parts god!!! ;) thanx, --==Richard==-- (URL) lugnet.year.2002, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes: (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) much easier. Perhaps the "stud" on its back is of the same kind of the one in the spiderman minifig. Further info gladly welcome. Pedro (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) Looks like the stud is on a vest, not the back of the fig itself. (URL) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:GrCC79.11o@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This one also caught mye eye. (URL) roof peak bricks in tan and grey (x1 each) and what appear to be tan and green medium slope corner (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) spiderman pic makes it clearer. ...I suspect the stud is so you can stick posts to the figs (like the skateboarder) so you can freeze them in the air for stunts during movies. This will be an excellent little piece IMHO. ...Of course, the best (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: Oooh, will you look at *this*...
|
|
(...) There's a few possibilities for what the stud is: - glued on, there were some minifigs designed to snap onto a shirt (like a 3-D emblem on a polo shirt...) which had a plastic piece with a stud glued to the back. This would be a bummer. I also (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
