 | | So it's finally 2002..
|
|
When's NASA going to launch a mission to the Ice Planet? (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
"Greg Majewski" <citrusx__@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gp9MHs.GIz@lugnet.com... (...) Well considering that by 2001 we couldn't pull off a cool centrifugal space station, a moon base or a manned flight to Jupiter, (even a decent re-release of (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
(...) Come to New York and see 2001 in Times Square. Unless it ended its run last night, a restored edition was playing in one theatre. I think it's across the street from McDonald's. They're watching and waiting. (23 years ago, 1-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
(...) Pretty much once you go past earth, just about everything is an ice planet, so it's a case of been there, done that. :-) The last movie I watched for 2001 was a deliberate choice: 2001 A Space Odessey. I remember my dad taking me to see that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
| |
| | Re: So it's finally 2002..
|
|
(...) Not to nit-pick, Bruce, but I think you mean "...the technology A. C. Clarke envisioned held up pretty well." A whole lot of what Clarke wrote has held up very well. Jeff J (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
