To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2002Open lugnet.year.2002 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2002 / *75 (-10)
  Re: 2002 SW line-up
 
(...) Argh! Ewoks! Looks like a handful of stuff from Episode II as well. :^) Should be interesting. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (25 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: 2002 SW line-up
 
At least it looks like all (5) movies are getting an equal treatment via new kits. The two 'Final Duel' kits - Final Duel Empfall & Final Duel Lukesrndr - I can imagine including Darth Vader, Jedi Luke & the Emperor - the final duel scene(s) from (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
 
  2002 SW line-up
 
A little tidbit from rebelscum.com and theforce.net. Looks pretty exciting! Take a peek now before this list gets pulled. rebelscum link: (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
 
(...) same (...) as (...) My impression was that they won't be releasing castle and Harry Potter at the same time was not a licensing issue, but an issue that they only want to support one theme in a general type, and since Harry Potter heavily (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: No speculations here...
 
(...) Perhaps Slave will take a differnt form in the next SW flick? Scott A (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: No speculations here...
 
They're saying that Lego is going to come out with another Slave I. It might be an UCS, because what's the point in having two minifig Slave I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
 
(...) Again, for those who have just joined us...: LoM is *not* considered Space any more than Aquazone (or Spaceport, which LoM replaces) was. If anything (shudder, shake, sputter) it's considered part of Town--phylogenically, but definitely NOT in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
 
just as Space cannot be released as (...) So this is officially confirmed? How and why could LTG release LOM then? Is inn't that considered Space legally? Eric (25 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
 
could this be someting from the moviemakers line?? no new castle.. noooooo "Matthew Teets" <matthew.teets@sciatl.com> wrote in message news:GHKAFC.6GM@lugnet.com... (...) even (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
 
  `The Undead Rise again?
 
`The Undead Rise again? If we can believe what Mr. Teets asserts is true, then the Castle world will surely become much more interestin’. (...) (URL) ***A “Monsters” Theme?*** The fantasy element returns to Castle… Even if the building parts hold (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.year.2002)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR