 | | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) Because the pteranodon piece is a SPUD, and they want to get back to more flexibility? eric (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) I agree. Thats the problem. As an adult I am torn between wanting exacting realism and buildability. Especially since Pteranodons, Pterodactyls and Pterosaurs have always been my favorite extinct animals I wish Lego had made a better head (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) Doesn't seem like their practice of late, but if this means we'll start seeing more brick-built aminals, I'm all for it. :^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) Ah, that's the spirit. :D I take it you are unaware of the Dinosaur line? There's a whole series in the Retailers' Catalogue using the parts seen in the Jurassic Park III sets (as well as some other ones) to build up the Dinos. Could be really (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) I don't go 'round looking for the retailer's catalogue. In any case, I'm going to be very disappointed if they stick that same dino head on every single different dinosaur. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (23 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good photos of Jurassic Park III sets
|
|
(...) the (...) the (...) Neither do I, but if I see it I see it. There are pics online, too. (...) They don't. eric (23 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
