To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2001Open lugnet.year.2001 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2001 / 403
Subject: 
Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 07:42:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1067 times
  
Nice going eric, at least you found something to laugh at.

From Yahoo Movies
http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&id=1803471100&cf=critic

Dungeons and Dragons (2000)

Critics Reviews

CNN.com: Dumb & dreadful - "...so poorly executed, you start to feel like you're
watching the world's most expensive script run-through."

Deseret News (Salt Lake City) - (1.5 stars) "...plain bad dumbness..."

E! Online - (grade: D) "...belongs locked up in a dark, dank dungeon of its
own."

Film Threat - (1 star) "Wisdom and Intellect: -10"

L.A. Weekly - "...a cheap Star Wars rip-off..."

Mr. Showbiz - (rating: 26/100) "...[a] D-grade cinematic cacophony..."

New York Times - "...not much fun."

People - "...features a bland teen cast..."

Roger Ebert - (1.5 stars) "...close your eyes and the dialogue sounds like an
overwrought junior high school play."

Variety - "...stunningly bad..."


Subject: 
Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2001
Date: 
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:57:59 GMT
Viewed: 
988 times
  
In lugnet.year.2001, Erik Olson writes:

CNN.com: Dumb & dreadful - "...so poorly executed, you start to feel like
you're
watching the world's most expensive script run-through."

<snip>

Blah, blah, blah.

I will freely admit it wasn't the best movie in the world.  But I had a really
good time at the movies that night, and it wasn't *in spite* of the movie I
saw, it was because of it (and, having seen both Bats and Supernova in the
theatre, I do know the difference).

Jeremy Irons overacted.  But it was fun to watch.  Marlon Wayans was
ridiculous.  But it was fun to watch.  The main evil henchman had blue lips for
no good reason.  But it was fun to watch.  Etc, etc, etc.

I guess it's all about setting your expectations correctly when deciding what
movie to see.  I wasn't expecting American Beauty or Fight Club (both of which
really had something to say, IMHO).  I wasn't even expecting Raiders of the
Lost Ark or Die Hard.  I was just expecting to have a laugh and a good time,
and I did.

eric


Subject: 
Re: LEGO Theatrical "trailer"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2001
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:16:14 GMT
Viewed: 
981 times
  
In lugnet.year.2001, Eric Joslin writes:

I guess it's all about setting your expectations correctly when deciding what
movie to see.  I wasn't expecting American Beauty or Fight Club (both of which
really had something to say, IMHO).  I wasn't even expecting Raiders of the
Lost Ark or Die Hard.  I was just expecting to have a laugh and a good time,
and I did.

  Taste is, of course, an individual matter, but since the movie was
attempting to be about D&D, it was beholden in large measure to the spirit
of the game.  As you yourself point out, the "writer" never played the game,
so right out of the blocks something is amiss.  That would be like me
writing the Harry Potter script without having read any of the books.
  Having said that, I have to say that Fight Club was one of the most
overblown, overdone, and overlong pieces of film I've ever seen.  (But
again, taste is an individual matter.)

    Dave!

FUT OT.FUN


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR