Year 2001 : 333


Year / 2001 / 333	332 \| 334

Subject:	Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:56:39 GMT
Viewed:	31 times

In lugnet.build.minifigs, Kyle Keppler writes: > Hehe, I personaly like the battle droid "figs" but the legs would be ALOT > beter if they wern't attached together... Now the alien figs, that's another > story, LEGO could have done better. I'd think they'd look rather robotic > with those BD parts, but I have no LOM sets yet so I can't be sure... Just an FYI, Only the torso and arms are Battle Droid parts. The Legs are actually more organic and bent at the knee. The are still fuzed like the BD lets though. Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group http://www.nelug.org/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
(...) Well, thats good to hear, but why must they be fuzed! I guess the little kiddies would break 'em... ;-) </Kyle> AIM: legomankyle or KyleKeppler ___...___ High Velocity LEGO: (URL) chat: (URL) Industries: (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Do we have a name for the new figs?
Hehe, I personaly like the battle droid "figs" but the legs would be ALOT beter if they wern't attached together... Now the alien figs, that's another story, LEGO could have done better. I'd think they'd look rather robotic with those BD parts, but (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.year.2001)

10 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search