|
|
 | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) No, it can't be true!! They're so ugly! A shame the pairs of legs are stuck together, although it'll be interesting to see what people can do with the new pieces. Good points: *Blue dragon arms, and is the T-Rex tongue a red dragon head? *The (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) Yes, i am fairly new to TRU (since the holidays) but when an individual at nearly any werkplace shows enthusiasm for ther job and their products, then, well, i suppose they are met with enthusiasm in return, the rep was more than happy to show (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| So is this a joke? What's up with the amtrak comment? Is amtrak coming out with a new train? Rose "Scott E. Sanburn" <ssanburn@cleanweb.net> wrote in message news:006601c0b77b$f6...default... (...) around (...) weekend (...) (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.trains, lugnet.year.2001)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| now... It is obvious that if this person were not to know he couldn't post things like this, he must be new right? If he's new, why would TLC show him new sets? Josh (just thought this might help) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) Blond hair! Woo-hoo! I can finally make Beatrix from FF VIII. -- Pawel (25 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
|
|
