 | | Re: Creator scourge strikes again!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I'd place that much significance on the Creator figures. I'd note that they look to be a similar scale to Fabuland (though perhaps with not quite the charm of Fabuland). Fabuland came and went during the life of minifigs. In fact, (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Did WE Create Creator?
|
|
After I thought about it for a while, I began to think "Did our complaints start the creator line?". We asked for less juniorization, and the LEGO company may have made the creator sets to say "The point of lego is still to build. There is more than (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Creator scourge strikes again!
|
|
Unless 2002 shows some sign of turnaround in the LEGO world, I'm afraid LEGO will lose a fan/customer in all areas except for technic/mindstorms. Being a town fan, if I can't mix new LEGO with the past 20 years worth of my collection then how am I (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Creator scourge strikes again!
|
|
"Rob D." <htduck.geo@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:B6A0F4E7.11222%...hoo.com... (...) on (...) the (...) new (...) the (...) I think thats what the previous post said. i.e. they were patented. However, patents eventually run out, as they now are (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Creator scourge strikes again!
|
|
in article G85w3s.KKv@lugnet.com, Will Hess at willhess@simflex.com wrote on 2/2/2001 9:20 PM: (...) See, now I think this is just crazy. Why on earth didn't Lego trademark the minifig? Then (although I am no lawyer), patent or no patent, no one (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
