 | | Vikings vs Castle? —John P. Henderson
|
| | | I just noticed .vikings at Lugnet. ...But shouldn't Vikings be a subgroup of Castle? (in much the same way as Ninja) Maybe that's just my inexperienced logic talking though, so please don't flame me if there is some heated reason I'm unaware of as (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle? — Rene Hoffmeister
|
| | | | (...) Hi Hendo, Please see this thread for further information: (URL) Godt! René (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle? —Benjamin Ellermann
|
| | | | | (...) I agree that Vikings are their own theme. But Ninja is also it's own independant theme and not a subgroup of Castle. It was marketed in the catalogs with the Ninja logo while Dark Forest and Fright Knights were marketed under the Castle (...) (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle? — Rene Hoffmeister
|
| | | | | | Hi Ben, (...) I always wondered why Ninja is a subgroup of Castle, too. But from what I know, changes in the Newsgroup tree and re-sorting grown groups is a potential No-No from the technical and organizational point of view. Probably, to change (...) (18 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle? —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | (...) Thanks Rene for the explanation. I can understand the logic behind the decision insofar as TLC markets it as a separate theme. I don't mean the following to be a debate but rather simply dicussion... However, for those who argue against any (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Vikings vs Castle? — Rene Hoffmeister
|
| | | | Hi Hendo, (...) Good idea, seems to be useful, I've done so. Leg Godt! Rene (18 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.vikings, lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
