 | | Re: Train Purity (was Got NMRA? (was.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Yes. I'd do it. I'd support it. I just wouldn't *like* it as much. But I'm much less pure than I was. If someone made a viable DCC kit that was installable by a guy who usually picks up the wrong end of the soldering iron, I'm there. If (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Train Purity (was Got NMRA? (was.... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Wouldn't you also go for wheels? Howabout an uncoupling ramp to go with the Kadee couplers (hey, I want nothing less than the best for couplers, if were going to go non-LEGO there, let's do it right). In some ways, the things I see most likely (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train Purity (was Got NMRA? (was.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) Yes. My list was an e.g. not exhaustive. (...) if (...) Maybe... is Kadee that incompetent of a mold maker though? I do know of at least one example where TLC might have made something for someone else but that's all I can say (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Train Purity (was Got NMRA? (was.... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) if (...) Yea, no reason Kadee couldn't do the box themselves. The advantage I was thinking of them basically doing a joint thing is that it would be more attractive to purists since it would now basically have TLC's blessing (and probably say (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
