 | | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) I hope you will stay involved :-) I think you've got the widest experience with LTCs (how many are you a member of?). (...) I'd love to see some work on module standards. It would be nice to head towards a standard height for the table (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary —Frank Filz
|
| | | | So is anything happening with the I*LTC? Just curious or possibly impatient... (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I dunno. But I'm expecting to hear something from Steve Barile. I know the mailing lists exist. Perhaps just start using one and let the "which list is it, we didn't pick a name yet" problem get solved later. Can you rename a pairlist? I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G9Kr6L.FEJ@lugnet.com... (...) we (...) pairlist? (...) Lists exists and Steve and I have communicated a fair amount with respect to adding names to it. I excpect that Steve will be (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
