Subject:
|
Re: New Tank Car
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:24:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
458 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.trains, James Powell writes:
>
> > Nice start, but lose the wagon plate if you can. US prototypes don't have
> > much other than a tank, maybe (but not always) a center spine, and some
> > mount points at the ends for the trucks. They end up looking quite flimsy.
>
>
> _modern_ US prototypes (those more recent than DOT 103 10 000 gal tank cars)
> don't have a separate frame.
That's what I believe I said.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New Tank Car
|
| (...) _modern_ US prototypes (those more recent than DOT 103 10 000 gal tank cars) don't have a separate frame. Older tank cars did have separate frames, and DOT 103's lasted until quite recently (and still do exist, just not in interchange (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread: ![New Tank Car -Rich Thompson (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -Harvey Henkelman (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -Larry Pieniazek (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -James Powell (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -Rich Thompson (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -Steve Chapple (19-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Tank Car -John Neal (20-Feb-01 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|