Subject:
|
Re: New Tank Car
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:23:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
468 times
|
| |
|
|
> Nice start, but lose the wagon plate if you can. US prototypes don't have
> much other than a tank, maybe (but not always) a center spine, and some
> mount points at the ends for the trucks. They end up looking quite flimsy.
_modern_ US prototypes (those more recent than DOT 103 10 000 gal tank cars)
don't have a separate frame. Older tank cars did have separate frames, and DOT
103's lasted until quite recently (and still do exist, just not in interchange
service, just like wooden cars :)
> I totally agree that these parts make tank cars (at 8 wide) very easy and I
> expect to see lots of new designs going forward.
I just bought 2 droid escape pods to have a play at making a CNWB or CPWB car
(They don't seem to come up...the blue grain hoppers, if you have seen
them...). I think they will work, but it may take a bit of engineering to make
one, and a sheet of blue paper (to wrap around).
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Tank Car
|
| (...) Nice start, but lose the wagon plate if you can. US prototypes don't have much other than a tank, maybe (but not always) a center spine, and some mount points at the ends for the trucks. They end up looking quite flimsy. I totally agree that (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
