 | | Re: New Tank Car —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Nice start, but lose the wagon plate if you can. US prototypes don't have much other than a tank, maybe (but not always) a center spine, and some mount points at the ends for the trucks. They end up looking quite flimsy. I totally agree that (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New Tank Car —James Powell
|
| | | | | (...) _modern_ US prototypes (those more recent than DOT 103 10 000 gal tank cars) don't have a separate frame. Older tank cars did have separate frames, and DOT 103's lasted until quite recently (and still do exist, just not in interchange (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: New Tank Car —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) That's what I believe I said. ++Lar (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New Tank Car —Rich Thompson
|
| | | | Here is a killer rendition of an 8-wide tank car using the Droid Escape Pod parts: (...) (set (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New Tank Car —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) SRC (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
