To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 9550
9549  |  9551
Subject: 
Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:36:15 GMT
Viewed: 
5176 times
  
Well said!

My LEGO Retailer friends tell me these same things all the time. Their customers
are very frustrated.

-Suz

In lugnet.trains, Kevin Loch writes:
> LEGO would be making a huge mistake if they assumed
> that the things we want are different than what
> kids want.  I hear just about every day from
> a very reliable source that parents and kids
> hate juniorized sets.  They want sets with more pieces.
> They want sets with more "bricks" rather than special pieces.
> They *really* want "girl sets that you can build like
> the boy sets." Even parents buying Duplo want more bricks,
> less tubes.  They want mid-sized Technic sets so they don't
> have to buy Mindstorms or Silver Champion to get some Technic
> parts.  They want sets they can build the main model, the alternate
> models and their own ideas using all of the pieces in the set.
> 
> I'm not making this stuff up, this is what actual parents
> and kids say every day while making LEGO purchasing decisions.
> 
> If LEGO is going to include the adult demographic in their
> target market that's great!  I hope they also realize that
> most of the rest of their target market wants the same things.
> 
> They want sets that are fun and challenging to build.  They want
> pieces they can re-use.
> 
> My guess it that their current strategy focuses more on playing
> than building.  The problem is that LEGO is a building toy.  It
> inspires the creative mind through the building process.  This is
> because it is only a coarse representation of reality.  The mind
> must fill in the gaps.  Play-focused toys are much more articulate,
> but infinately less configurable.  LEGO should return to focusing
> on the building experience.  Playablility still plays a minor role,
> quite naturally after the building is complete, but it should
> not be the primary focus.
> 
> KL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: From the first LEGO(r) Train Summit: LEGO(r) Trains are alive and well
 
LEGO would be making a huge mistake if they assumed that the things we want are different than what kids want. I hear just about every day from a very reliable source that parents and kids hate juniorized sets. They want sets with more pieces. They (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)  

44 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR