| |
In lugnet.trains.org, John Matthews writes:
> [snip]
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> news:G77JA4.7Mx@lugnet.com...
> > Mine are huge (12x16hundred) so will be a lot slower to view. I just
> > uploaded a big zip and it failed to work so I have to do it image by
> image.
>
> That would be your first clue that these images are *way* too big for most
> folks.
Since I haven't sat down and figured out how to automatically resize and
rename a bunch of pictures at once inside of the tool I use, the time to
reformat all of them wasn't available to me. So it came down to those or
none. I chose those rather than none.
Since you have thumbnails to choose from, you only pay the price for ones
you want to see. Since other people uploaded smaller ones, you don't have to
look at mine at all if large images get you all annoyed.
I could see a basis for your carping if I was the only source. But I wasn't.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Show report
|
| [snip] Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G77JA4.7Mx@lugnet.com... (...) image. That would be your first clue that these images are *way* too big for most folks. Thanks for sharing Larry, but these pictures would be (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.town)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
