Subject:
|
Re: Baseplate vs Brick landscape (was: Re: Show report)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 05:37:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3293 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains.org, John Neal writes:
> On a related note: it
> seems to me that TLC used to make their dioramas out of bricks more than they
> do today. Now, it's mostly computerized backdrops. I always thought that it
> was due to cost considerations-- I never thought it might be because someone
> *preferred*
> it that way. I wonder how others feel? Others?
I assumed that TLC uses drawn/computerized backgrounds so that no one can
claim they are being misleading about the contents of the package. For
instance, on the 3225 Classic Train, they used drawn-in track instead of
real track, because there was none in the set.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Baseplate vs Brick landscape (was: Re: Show report)
|
| (...) Interesting analysis, Kevin. I am curious, would you then advocate using, say a mountain, which is non-LEGO and made out of paper mache? On a related note: it seems to me that TLC used to make their dioramas out of bricks more than they do (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
