 | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) I'm sorry, did I say it wasn't? :-) I doooon't THIINK so... You got away with your advocacy *this time* because it WAS relevant. My warning is to preclude you in future should you be tempted during a *non* relevant thread. Hope that helps. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —John Neal
| | | | | (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical thinking on your part. (...) Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
