 | | Re: Three New Train Cars —John Neal
|
| | | (...) First off, the thread is about 8 wide cars, so your 6 thin comments are irrelevant. *I* gratuitously mentioned 14 wide, so there-- you are rong. -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Kai Brodersen
|
| | | | | (...) Well john this isnt your day is it and since i still have a grudge rong is spelled Wrong :Þ (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) John, do you want to tell him or should I? Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) heh-- my fault for not using Senor Winky or Mr Sic;-) (language barriers are in place here so I will give Kai credit for catching my misteak) -John (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm not sure about a language barrier--he writes as well as some allegedly native speakers of English I know! Still, I apologize to Kai for my snippy jab; nothing was meant by it. Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'm sorry, did I say it wasn't? :-) I doooon't THIINK so... You got away with your advocacy *this time* because it WAS relevant. My warning is to preclude you in future should you be tempted during a *non* relevant thread. Hope that helps. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical thinking on your part. (...) Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
