To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 780
779  |  781
Subject: 
Re: Electrical Things (was: Railroad Dilemma)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:21:36 GMT
Viewed: 
2896 times
  
I'm not sure I agree that the voltage is variable. People have reported
(via oscilloscope analysis) that it's pulse width modulated 9V instead.
This will read on an analog meter like a low voltage, because it's
taking the average across time.

If you have any URL's where people have reported on this, I'd be interested.

The motor power unit has a resistance of 8.7 ohms, so at max. speed, it's
eating up about an amp. (or about 9 watts of power).

How did you measure that resistance? Ohmmeter across an unpowered motor?
I don't think an amp sounds right. You can battery power these motors
for a good long while on 6 AA batteries. I bet the resistance is a bit
higher with voltage applied.

Yep - it was ohmmeter across unpowered moter. I did think about directly
measuring the current with the motor running, but my multimeter has a
maximum current rating of 0.2A - so the voltage and resistance readings
I was getting were kinda suggesting I'd probably trash my multimeter if I
did that :) If the resistance does increase with an applied voltage, that
might explain why I couldn't get a consistent calculation for the
transformer's internal resistance.

Simon
http://www.SimonRobinson.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Electrical Things (was: Railroad Dilemma)
 
(...) So would I, because it's not true! As I've said this many times, it's plain and simple variable DC voltage with 6 steps. Look at... (URL) (...) Also not true. The resistance of the motor is not enough to determine the current it will draw (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Electrical Things (was: Railroad Dilemma)
 
(...) I'm not sure I agree that the voltage is variable. People have reported (via oscilloscope analysis) that it's pulse width modulated 9V instead. This will read on an analog meter like a low voltage, because it's taking the average across time. (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains)

21 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR