 | | Re: Another German MOC: BR 361 of DB —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Oh, I'll give you that. But remember, even if prototypes *could* negotiate tight curves like that, they would look as ungainly doing it. (...) Yikes. Need a better reason than that! :-) (...) Actually, the wheels are a bit large (if we are (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another German MOC: BR 361 of DB —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | (...) John, Hey, I am not that happy with the W.C./head/toilet/pot...t/whatever in my caboose...you got any pointers? Chris (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Another German MOC: BR 361 of DB —James Powell
|
| | | | (...) tight (...) Strangely enough, I have seen photos of boxcabs and 40 ft boxcars going around 60' radius curves. They _do_ look funny doing it though. (The pic's are of NYC harbor railways)...I'm aware that some of the logging railways claimed (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another German MOC: BR 361 of DB —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) And I wasn't even referring to something as short as a scale 40 footer (32 studs for me); what I had in mind were my 60 stud long passenger cars... -John (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
