Subject:
|
Re: new bridge
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:09:19 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu&spamcake&
|
Viewed:
|
1141 times
|
| |
|
|
The columns could be taller if you wanted to make the arches more shallow.
Chris
P.S. It still looks better than any arched bridge that I have tried to make.
Dan Boger wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes:
> > Dan,
> >
> > It is a nice bridge, but (sorry I had to add a but) it seems that the
> > arches are too pointy. It almost looks like the arches are gothic arches.
> > I am more used to seeing arches that are either romanesque or flatter
> > than romanesque (like the simple looking bridges that cross the Seine in
> > Paris).
>
> Well, the limitations of the baseplate size, and the required height pretty
> much dictated the arches.
>
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > P.S. It looks better than any arched bridge that I have tried to make.
>
> Thanks! :)
>
> Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: new bridge
|
| (...) Well, the limitations of the baseplate size, and the required height pretty much dictated the arches. (...) Thanks! :) Dan (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
