 | | Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only —James Mathis
|
| | | Newsgrps: rec.toys.lego To : Frode Torske <Frode.Torske@hydro.com> Attchmnt: Subject : Re: The "fourth" Monorail set (...) handle (...) Hmmm, Mono rail? Mono, meaning one or single.... Maybe you could use *only* one of the two 4.5v radius curves: (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only —Gregor Benedikt Rochow
|
| | | | (...) Or use both and have parallel double curves... (...) No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded. (...) What issues? (...) ...and makes them a rather sorry excuse for a monorail - 2-track wheels on a flat surface an all... (...) Not (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only —James Mathis
|
| | | | (...) That is great point. However, the tracks would need to be spaced 4 radial studs from each other for the path to remain truly parallel to one another throughout an entire circle, and I'm not sure how wide a monorail train for this single 4.5v (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
