 | | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) No, I meant the admission that I was pedantic. :-) I may have to give up on TLG string, though. Some darnfools are running the string prices way up in AucZILLA. :-) (...) Sanding drivers is perfectly good form, that's what the sand dome on a (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence? —John Neal
| | | | | Please, Larry, do not omit the diesels and their sand needs as well. Isn't it stored in the nose? BTW the whole issue of using larger drivers, 6 drivers, etc., is mute (sic) because the turning radius of Lego track is too sharp- what to do about (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence? —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Usually. Indeed, sand is still important, but nowadays antislip microprocessors and high adhesion trucks, as well as the fact that all axles are powered, greatly reduces the need for it except in extreme situations. (...) Moot. Well, I'd do (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | |
