Subject:
|
Re: Remote Points
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Mar 2000 05:48:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@/spamless/novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
949 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Poindexter wrote:
>
> I have seen numerous ideas for remote operating switches (points) and they
> all look like they try to tackle the problem from the same place, the top.
I believe some of the earliest work on remote points advocates opening
up the bottom, but merely to loosen up the mechanism. (file down the
bumps, as you say)....
Your idea of actually leaving the cover off and then working the switch
from underneath is interesting... to the non purist. But hey, I read the
DCC stuff with intense interest, if TLC doesn't lead me to beleive
they're thinking seriously about it, my purity level may be slipping
soon.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Remote Points
|
| I seleniod switch, and DCC are very interesting ideas. They are unpure, I guess, but it is not like you are painting or cutting bricks. I have two motorized points, and at $25 (estimate on motor and parts) each a nonLEGO solution, especially if it (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Remote Points
|
| I have seen numerous ideas for remote operating switches (points) and they all look like they try to tackle the problem from the same place, the top. Why wouldn't it be possible to crack open the bottom of the switch, file down the bumps on the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
