 | | (canceled) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery —Douglas Pegram
|
| | | | (...) they (...) regulator (...) multiple (...) I would really hope that they would provide a means to upgrade current motors to "DCC Ready", if that is in fact the case, personally I would love to see a LEGO product out of the box(es) be able to be (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | (...) <<snip> (...) build (...) This has been a thought of mine for quite some time, (the build into the walls of my house, not the camera part, though, that would be kind of cool too..) The idea has been nay-say'd by the best of them, but I still (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery —William A. Swanberg
|
| | | | | "Doug" <DPegram@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:Fq9HrK.Asy@lugnet.com... (...) motors (...) see a (...) perform (...) track, (...) amazing) (...) build (...) I think it would be difficult to provide some kind of "consumer upgrade" to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | If they use a Mindstorms like comuter brick then no modofication to the motor should be need. The computer brick would control the voltage...D'OH! I just realized the problem...the motor cnanot get current from the rails and the computer brick at (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
