Subject:
|
Re: New train: Cisalpino
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Jan 2000 00:37:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.%NoSpam%com
|
Viewed:
|
2076 times
|
| |
|
|
Tom Stangl wrote:
>
> I dunno, the pantographs are pretty self evident:
> 2 2.5 tiles with fingers
> 2 3L rods with 2/3 fingers
> 2 1.5L rods with 3 fingers/stud
> 2 1x1 tiles with clip
> 1 chrome rod (you could also probably use the grey rod from the STAPs)
I've got the parts list sussed, where I am a little stuck is how the two
arms come together at the very top. the 1x1 tiles can't both be in the
same vertical plane.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New train: Cisalpino
|
| (...) Like it or not: They're not in the same vertical plane. ;-) Just something I slapped on the roof to try out- give a simple hint of character kinda similar to some of the real Cisalpino pictures. Maybe I've seen someone else try this same (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New train: Cisalpino
|
| I dunno, the pantographs are pretty self evident: 2 2.5 tiles with fingers 2 3L rods with 2/3 fingers 2 1.5L rods with 3 fingers/stud 2 1x1 tiles with clip 1 chrome rod (you could also probably use the grey rod from the STAPs) (...) -- | Tom Stangl, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
