 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets —Eric Brok
|
| | | Matthew Bates wrote in message ... (...) Too bad it's isn't a sheared crossing, lik the DUPLO one. (...) it (...) set (...) DARK (...) They sure look dark grey in the catalog. Like the Res-Q base. Eric (25 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets —Gary Louie
|
| | | | "Eric Brok" <brok@fcjsvc.hvu.nl> wrote (...) Sheard crossing? What is a sheared crossing? Is it a non 90 degree crossing, like a 45/135 degree ctossing? I'm confused. Too bad Duplo trains can't run on 12V/4.5V/9V setups. Gary GaryLouie@EarthLink.Net (25 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets —Eric Brok
|
| | | | Gary Louie wrote in message <369D13E5.AFCF82B3@E...nk.Net>... (...) same (...) Yes, that's what I meant. There should be a crossing to connect switches/points in a dual cross-over setup. Eric Brok (25 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 Train Sets —Matthew Bates
|
| | | | Eric Brok writes: > (...) I too would like to see a diamond crossing (that's what I call it anyway) but that would require a new style of points/switch. The current one curves one way and then starts curving back the other way, so even if Lego made (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
