 | | Re: IT'S TOO DARN QUIET!!!!!! —Chris van Lottum
|
| | | (...) You seem to be rather protective of YOUR thread ;) Are we not worthy? Do we polute your thread? Ooops I appear to have stood on your grass :p Chris (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IT'S TOO DARN QUIET!!!!!! —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) I know that you are kidding, but it is for the sake of the poster that I am concerned! This is a crummy, rant thread, unworthy to have MOC posts of others buried in it! Also, it makes it very hard to search for MOCs in the future when things (...) (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IT'S TOO DARN QUIET!!!!!! —Chris van Lottum
|
| | | | | (...) ... Snip ... (...) O be patient ranting one WIP will come and go but MOCs will be announced and posted when it is their time. Ohmmmm ... And to strike a serious note (I am rarely serious) - I fully agree with your point. If I was posting (...) (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: IT'S TOO DARN QUIET!!!!!! —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I've never deemed any of your rants to be 'crummy'--what other colourful words I may have used to describe your rants aside... :p And this thread is worthy. At the very least, it's (...) (16 years ago, 23-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
