Subject:
|
Re: LTC question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:53:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5053 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
>
> I'm not exactly sure that there's a formal requirement for having an LTC. I
> always just assumed it meant that a group of people got together and built train
> layouts.
>
> But I could be wrong...
>
> Tim
>
> PS. Is that KeithLTC or NevLTC?
I can't believe you'd even ask me that question Tim. With an ego the size of
Montana, do your really think I'd use a geographical location in my LTC title?
KeithLUG defies conventional geo-political boundaries: well...we have 3
Canadian members, and who knows where Nannan is actually from, so I'll be
calling it KeithLTC.
Thanks for the info, be it right or wrong, I received so much conflicting info
at the fest that I felt compelled to ask.
If anyone else has conflicting info, I'd be interested in hearing it.
Thanks, fellow train-heads.
-Keith
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LTC question
|
| (...) Sorry. (...) Do you mean an LTC that will be recognised by ILTCO? Given that you could legally change your name to KeithLTC and can walk around calling yourself whatever you want I assume you can have KeithLTC without any hassles. Having it (...) (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LTC question
|
| (...) I'm not exactly sure that there's a formal requirement for having an LTC. I always just assumed it meant that a group of people got together and built train layouts. But I could be wrong... Tim PS. Is that KeithLTC or NevLTC? (17 years ago, 16-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
