Subject:
|
Re: Flat Car
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:15:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3184 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.announce.moc, Didier Enjary wrote:
| |
Hi,
Since long ago, I feel the need of flat cars for my train collection.
|
<snip>
| |
So my try is there :
IE user friendly BS
gallery
As you can see, it is 6-wide. Well, that’s my choice. It could be discuss for
years. I think I’ve heard and read (with a great pleasure as long they were
expressed friendly) all the pros and cons about this choice :-). So, let
have your own try at 8 or 7 or even 2 wide.
|
Bonjour, Didier!
I applaud your effort and agree with you that flat cars are a MUST for any train
collection. For me, intermodal transport is the best! Flat cars allow the
builder to show off fun things that otherwise might not get to be displayed.
For you it is 3-wheelers or forklifts
(VERY COOL, BTW!).
For me, it is containers with fun logos on them. But you have inspired me to try my hand at
some actual flat cars in addition to my well-cars.
As far as the 6/7/8 wide debate goes, it is mostly for fun and comraderie, no?
:-)
Thanks for posting!
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Flat Car
|
| (...) Merci beaucoup John pour ces commentaires amicaux. (...) it goes without saying :) (...) (18 years ago, 19-Oct-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Flat Car
|
| Hi, Since long ago, I feel the need of flat cars for my train collection. Flat cars are the simpliest cars and that is part of the challenge when you decide to have a try in modeling one (LEGOly speaking) : how to make a nice rail car made only of a (...) (18 years ago, 17-Oct-06, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
