 | | Re: And that's kicking your Class [50]... —Samarth Moray
| | | | In lugnet.trains, Jason J. Railton wrote: SNIP WOW! It certainly does kick my class 50! And IMHO Mark's too! I always love functionality, and for such a little diesel, this one sure is packed with features! That is some seriously amazing work. The (...) (19 years ago, 26-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: And that's kicking your Class [50]... —Jason J. Railton
| | | | | | (...) I'm glad you like it. It makes it very heavy though, so it really needs both motors. Originally it just had one, but it didn't move very fast. It also made the power pick up from the back of the front motor extremely complicated. That's much (...) (19 years ago, 26-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: And that's kicking your Class [50]... —Mark Bellis
| | | | | (...) You disappoint me Samarth. Jason didn't mean "kick everyone else's MOCs"! The idea was to kick some @$$ with a great MOC, which he has done. There isn't really a comparison with other MOCs of any scale. I agree about the well executed (...) (19 years ago, 26-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: And that's kicking your Class [50]... —Samarth Moray
| | | | | (...) LOL OK, OK, you're right, in hindsight, it does seem like an apples and oranges sort of comparision... :-) (...) I too have noticed that seems to be a problem with a lot of the more complicated loco MOCs. Legoswami (19 years ago, 27-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | |
